Embracing Innovation in Community Sports Organizations Amid COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic presented unprecedented challenges for community sport organizations (CSOs), forcing them to rethink their strategies and swiftly adapt to a rapidly changing environment. Innovation, defined as the integration of new ideas or practices, became vital for organizational resilience and continuity in these turbulent times.
The Role of Innovation in Organizational Survival
Innovation serves as a cornerstone for the long-term effectiveness and sustainability of organizations. For CSOs, the need to innovate often arises in response to shifts in technology, demographic trends, and external threats. During the pandemic, organizations not only had to adjust to evolving societal expectations but also adapt to government directives and resource constraints. Their capacity to resume operations and offer modified programs hinged on their ability to secure essential resources such as skilled personnel and external funding. Clubs unable to comply with governing guidelines or lacking the ability to implement new approaches faced difficulties in sustaining their operations.
Navigating Radical Change During Crisis
Major global events like the pandemic often require organizations to enact rapid, radical changes. Typically, organizations prefer incremental adjustments, as these are easier for stakeholders to accept. However, COVID-19 necessitated more comprehensive transformations—such as strict safety protocols, restructured activities, and no-contact play formats—to ensure participant safety.
While such sweeping reforms might usually encounter resistance, the pandemic fostered an atmosphere of collective understanding among stakeholders. Players welcomed the opportunity to return to sport, even under strict rules. Parents and guardians valued the chance for their children to engage in physical activity. Coaches and volunteers, too, recognized the importance of adhering to new guidelines. Those unwilling to comply simply opted out, minimizing broader pushback and allowing organizations to focus on safety and continuity.
The Critical Influence of Leadership in Driving Innovation
Transformative changes cannot occur without strong leadership. Having innovation champions within the organization—individuals with expertise, enthusiasm, and a willingness to embrace change—greatly improves the likelihood of successful implementation. Access to outside knowledge and collaborative partnerships with Provincial (PSO) and National Sport Organizations (NSO) can further bolster these efforts.
Open and proactive communication also plays a vital role. CSOs actively engaged stakeholders by sharing “Return to Play” guides, conducting feedback surveys, and maintaining transparent communication channels throughout the process. Strategic leadership traits such as risk tolerance, vision, and the willingness to challenge the status quo emerged as recurring factors among organizations that navigated the pandemic most effectively. When leaders were visibly committed to the cause, the broader community—staff, coaches, families—was more likely to follow suit, creating a unified push for innovation at every level.
Lessons Learned: Facilitating Change Under Pressure
The urgency for innovation during the COVID-19 crisis revealed new insights into how radical changes can be executed efficiently, provided there is a shared vision and mutual commitment to key goals like safety and public health. Successful innovation relied on several foundational pillars:
– Strong leadership invested in adapting to change
– Effective stakeholder engagement through open communication and education
– Strategic use of internal expertise and external resources
– A culture that values risk-taking and flexibility
By integrating these elements, community sports organizations were able to overcome significant adversity and adapt to a fundamentally altered landscape.
References
- Camisón-Zornoza, C., Lapiedra-Alcamí, R., Segarra-Ciprés, M., & Boronat-Navarro, M. (2004). A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organization Studies, 25(3), 331-361.
- Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: effects of environment, organization and top managers. British Journal of Management, 17(3), 215-236.
- Doherty, A., Millar, P., & Misener, K. (2020). Return to community sport: Leaning on evidence in turbulent times. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1-7.
- Hoeber, L., Doherty, A., Hoeber, O., & Wolfe, R. (2015). The nature of innovation in community sport organizations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(5), 518-534.
- Hoeber, L., & Hoeber, O. (2012). Determinants of an innovation process: A case study of technological innovation in a community sport organization. Journal of Sport Management, 26(3), 213-223.
- Jaskyte, K. (2004). Transformational leadership, organizational culture, and innovativeness in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(2), 153-168.
- Wemmer, F., Emrich, E., & Koenigstorfer, J. (2016). The impact of coopetition-based open innovation on performance in nonprofit sports clubs. European Sport Management Quarterly, 16(3), 341-363.
- Wicker, P., Filo, K., & Cuskelly, G. (2013). Organizational resilience of community sport clubs impacted by natural disasters. Journal of Sport Management, 27(6), 510-525.
- Winand, M., & Anagnostopoulos, C. (2017). Get ready to innovate! Staff’s disposition to implement service innovation in non-profit sport organisations. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 9(4), 579-595.
