Euro 2020 Opener: Italy Surges Past Turkey with Tactical Mastery
The highly anticipated kickoff of Euro 2020 saw Italy make a commanding statement, defeating Turkey 3-0 after an initial period of solid Turkish resistance. The encounter, marked by patient Italian buildup and disciplined Turkish defense, gradually shifted as Roberto Mancini’s side found the right tactical adjustments to break through. Below is a detailed breakdown of the match’s strategic landscape.
Tactical Lineups and Formations
Both teams began with their expected systems, setting the stage for a chess match in both midfield and the final third.
Turkey Starting XI (4-1-4-1) | Italy Starting XI (4-3-3) |
---|---|
GK: Ugurcan Cakir RB: Mehmet Zeki Celik CB: Merih Demiral CB: Caglar Soyuncu LB: Umut Meras DM: Okay Yokuslu RW: Kenan Karaman CM: Yusuf Yazici CM: Ozan Tufan LW: Hakan Calhanoglu CF: Burak Yilmaz |
GK: Gianluigi Donnarumma RB: Alessandro Florenzi CB: Leonardo Bonucci CB: Giorgio Chiellini LB: Leonardo Spinazzola DM: Jorginho CM: Nicolo Barella CM: Manuel Locatelli RW: Domenico Berardi CF: Ciro Immobile LW: Lorenzo Insigne |
Turkey’s Defensive Approach: Adapting to Italian Pressure
Turkey’s game plan focused heavily on defense. While lined up in a 4-1-4-1, this formation quickly morphed into a back five—often shifting to a 5-4-1 or 5-2-3—when under sustained Italian attack. Kenan Karaman tracked Italy’s aggressive left-sided play, effectively making Turkey’s right side an extension of their defense. Midfielders Tufan and Yokuslu supported by narrowing the central spaces, seeking to neutralize Italy’s midfield maestros and inverted wide attackers.
At times, Yusuf Yazici, Hakan Calhanoglu, and Burak Yilmaz held their positions higher upfield, aiming to spark a counterattack if the chance arose, though with limited involvement in deeper defensive roles. Caglar Soyuncu, Zeki Celik, and Merih Demiral adapted to tightly mark Italy’s most creative and advanced threats—especially focusing on Insigne and Immobile during buildup play.
Turkey’s back line and defensive midfielder proved adept at winning aerial duels, especially against Immobile. This enabled them to repel many long Italian passes and restrict Italy largely to low-percentage long shots and left-flank penetrations, particularly through Spinazzola. Despite this solid start, Turkey’s defensive structure began to falter in the second half as Italy increased the intensity and diversified their attacks.
Turkey in Possession: Struggles to Build and Progress
Whenever Turkey managed to win the ball back, they found it difficult to establish meaningful possession or threaten Italy’s goal. Attempts to play long balls from deep, especially targeting Burak Yilmaz’s runs behind the Italian defense, either fell short or were nullified by veteran defenders Bonucci and Chiellini. Goalkeeper Ugurcan Cakir faced particular difficulties under pressure, often defaulting to aimless clearances that quickly surrendered possession.
During their own build-up play, Turkey sometimes resembled a 2-1-4-3, with Yokuslu ahead of two central defenders and full-backs stepping into midfield. However, this structure rarely translated into prolonged possession or effective progression, as Italy’s midfielders rapidly recovered the ball and launched new attacks. Most of Turkey’s rare opportunities sprung from swift, hopeful transitions rather than elaborate team play.
Italy’s Defensive Setup: Compact and Quick to React
Italy’s approach was anchored on relentless ball recovery and disciplined transitions. With 63% possession overall, their actual defending was limited, but when called upon, they shifted fluidly into a lopsided 3-5-2 formation. Spinazzola’s high positioning and Berardi’s support on the right contributed to a compact midfield shield, often skewed to favor the left. Insigne and Immobile lurked higher up the pitch, primed for rapid transitions.
Italy’s experienced center-back pairing managed Turkey’s few direct balls expertly, assisted by Donnarumma when needed. Central to Italy’s effective defensive transitions was the trio of Jorginho, Locatelli, and Barella, who continually disrupted Turkish buildup, set the tempo for pressing, and stifled any threat before it could materialize.
Italy on the Ball: From Patient Probing to Ruthless Execution
Italy’s attacking buildup revolved around a diamond or pentagon-shaped structure at the back, with Jorginho and frequently Locatelli dropping deep to support Bonucci and Chiellini. This allowed the full-backs and wide attackers to push high or invert, causing disarray in Turkey’s defensive assignments.
Lorenzo Insigne’s movements were integral, often dropping deep to assist in progressing play, while Spinazzola and Immobile provided secondary outlets and width. Italy’s ball circulation in the first half was steady and controlled, but especially down the left. Despite their dominance in possession, Italy initially struggled to create clear openings, often forced into speculative shots or congested flanks.
The second half brought a decisive shift in tactics and attitude:
– Italy increased their speed and directness, attacking more frequently down the right.
– They engaged in quicker passing combinations and took more risks vertically.
– By committing numbers forward and reducing the wait for openings, Italy capitalized as Turkey’s structure frayed under sustained pressure.
These changes reversed the dynamic, culminating in three second-half goals that reflected not only Italy’s technical quality, but their superior adaptability and tactical discipline.
What Lies Ahead for Both Teams
This result places Italy at the top of Group A, full of confidence and momentum. Going forward, maintaining a balance between both flanks and leveraging their depth on the right—particularly through the interplay of Berardi and the advancing right-back—will make Mancini’s team even more unpredictable and dangerous.
For Turkey, addressing their inability to retain possession and striking a better balance between defense and attack will be crucial in future fixtures. Their next challenge requires a reassessment, as another tactical rearguard will not suffice against determined opposition.
Key Takeaways
– Italy’s tactical flexibility, patient buildup, and intelligent second-half adjustments were central to their comprehensive win.
– Turkey’s stout defense impressed early but could not sustain under Italy’s evolving approach and added urgency.
– Both teams’ use of shape and role adaptation underline the importance of in-game tactical shifts at the highest level.
This match set the tempo for Euro 2020, highlighting why Italy under Mancini will be a formidable contender throughout the tournament, while Turkey will need to quickly find answers to stay in the race.